(Or, I suppose would be more appropriate given this is my second post, 'Why I've decided to start blogging'.)
I've read blogs for many years, but have never commented or blogged myself before. But in recent months, I've read articles talking about how the right in the UK dominates the blogosphere, and decided that as someone with centre-left views I should do something to redress that balance.
To give a bit of background to myself, I am in my mid-20s, I am a Labour party member and I live in London (having moved south from Labour's northern heartlands). I am very much of the centre-left, making my opinions based on their arguments and merits. Unfortunately, this means I often take positions at odds with the Labour party.
However, I would like to debate them. Working in the private sector in a job far removed from politics, I miss the mental stimulation of debating and discussing policies which I had at university. Hopefully this will provide a means for me to get back to that.
Tuesday, December 27, 2011
|Soon to mean 80 mph?|
However, this raises a question for me: a 60 mph motorway limit would likely bring about a reduction in road deaths; a 50 mph limit even more so. Would those criticising proposals to raise the motorway limit support lowering it to 40 or even 30 mph? Most, I'm pretty sure, would not.
All speed limits are arbitrary. And as limits increase, so do accidents and deaths. But, this is mirrored by a reduction in journey times and an improved quality of life for the millions of people making journeys on our roads.
Our 70 mph limit was set in 1965 when few cars could even exceed 70 mph. Modern safety developments mean family cars are now designed to be suitable to safely drive at higher speeds, and in most of the rest of Europe they legally can. It merely seems like a 'normal' limit to us because it's what we're used to.
Safety is important, but this debate must accept that there is a continuum of speeds at which the limit could be set. Those who wish to raise our current limit are not necessarily reckless and uncaring, they're just picking a higher point on a scale where convenience increases alongside accidents and deaths. Whatever point you happen to advocate, short of banning cars moving at all, there will always be another point you could have chosen where fewer cars would crash and fewer people would die.